This article was mentioned in the book The
Creative Destruction of Medicine. The book also mentioned the article “Why
Most Published Research Findings Are False”, which Peter Bevelin brought up
in my 2009
interview with him.
For
many scientists, the effect is especially troubling because of what it exposes
about the scientific process. If replication is what separates the rigor of
science from the squishiness of pseudoscience, where do we put all these
rigorously validated findings that can no longer be proved? Which results
should we believe? Francis Bacon, the early-modern philosopher and pioneer of
the scientific method, once declared that experiments were essential, because
they allowed us to “put nature to the question.” But it appears that nature
often gives us different answers.
....................
Related article: Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science
....................
Related article: Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science